Prescription for Disaster

Sebelius Throws DOJ Under the Bus

Friday, March 02, 2012
Okay - DOJ has repeatedly argued that the individual mandate is a tax to fend off legal challenges about the constitutionality of the mandate and ObamaCare as a whole. This gives them the "hook" to claim the law is constitutional because it is based on Congress' taxing powers. The law itself, however, states it is not a tax.

At any rate, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius threw DOJ under the bus in testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee the other day when she said that the mandate was "not a tax per se."


Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC


Bookmark and Share

Obama Wants to Slash Health Care for Military

Wednesday, February 29, 2012
According to a post at Big Government, the Obama Administration is poised to push military servicemen and women into ObamaCare's exchanges by making their current healthcare program unaffordable. This idea is particularly grievous because military personal often have special health care needs (such as rehabilitation, occupational therapy and prosthetic assistance) as a result of war wounds. To push them into a civilian system is to effectively deny our nation's wounded warriors the help they deserve.

Here is what Big Government had to say:

The Obama Administration plans to force active duty service members and veterans off the military’s current health care plan, Tricare, and into ObamaCare’s state-run healthcare exchanges by increasing Tricare premiums between 30 percent to 78 percent the first year and a crushing 94 percent to 345 percent every five years thereafter.

By squeezing service members and veterans out of Tricare and into ObamaCare through significantly higher Tricare premiums, the Obama Administration believes it can pinch $1.8 billion from Tricare in fiscal 2013 and $12.9 billion by 2017.

By comparison, Mr. Obama spent $20.5 billion on his Department of Energy green energy grants and loans program, 80 percent of which went to companies owned or tied to Mr. Obama’s top fundraisers.

You can read the full post here.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC

Bookmark and Share

Mark Steyn on the Perversion of Rights

Monday, February 27, 2012
Mary Steyn has a wonderfully written commentary on the impact of ObamaCare on individual liberty and how ObamaCare undermines individual rights. Please read his full commentary here.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC 


Bookmark and Share

DeMint Weighs In on Religious Tyranny of Contraception Rule

Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Senator DeMint has written that the only way to protect against the tyranny of the Obama Administration's contraception rule is to repeal ObamaCare, the law by which the government is attempting to justify its power grab that violates religious (and other) freedoms.

Read his commentary here.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC 


Bookmark and Share

The Identicalness of RomneyCare and ObamaCare

Wednesday, February 01, 2012
AHEC commends to articles to your reading list, both of which go into detail about the similarities between RomneyCare and ObamaCare.

Read the two articles here:  Article 1 (WSJ)  Article 2 (NewsMax).

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC


Bookmark and Share

Arkansas Says "No" to ObamaCare Exchange

Tuesday, December 06, 2011

According to reports, Arkansas is joining the list of states that have decided against establishing an ObamaCare insurance exchange. Arkanasas' Governor, Mike Beebe, said he would not seek federal funds to establish the exchange without the support of the state legislature - support that clearly does not exist.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC.


Bookmark and Share

AMA: 72 Million Reasons it Supported ObamaCare

Monday, November 28, 2011

Forbes has a new article detailing how the American Medical Association sold out doctors and patients to preserve its government granted billing code monopoly - a move that will give the AMA continued revenue of $72 million per year. It seems that the AMA betrayed free-market principles in order to maintain a system that violates free-market principles.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC.


Bookmark and Share

What Politicians Need to Understand About Marginal Costs

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

The Atlantic has an interesting article about Netflix and marginal costs. What does that have to do with healthcare? The author buried a little nugget in there that is instructive about why liberals ideas about health care policy will not work in the long run and will jeopardize innovation as well.  She writes:

"You can get a sweet deal if you are the customer who gets marginal cost pricing. Medicare does this--reimburses hospitals at above their marginal cost, but below their average cost, so that private insurers have to pick up most of the hospital overhead. European countries do this with prescription drugs: reimburse above the marginal cost of producing the pills, but below the total cost of developing the pills, so that the US has to pick up most of the tab for drug development. The problem is that as voters and as customers, we often get the notion that this can be extrapolated to everyone. So liberal policy wonks want to save money by putting everyone on Medicare, or some equivalent program that uses the government's monopsony pricing power to get lower prices for everyone.... But everyone cannot be the marginal cost consumer. Someone has to cover things like development costs." 

The bottom line is that ObamaCare tries to lower costs through price controls and by restricting access to care. In the end this will reduce choices, drive doctors from their chosen profession, and retard research and development in the field of health care. The implications for patients will be disastrous.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC.


Bookmark and Share

Obama Administration Causes Medical Billing to Go to the Birds

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

According to The Wall Street Journal today, a federal mandated update to medical coding and billing is on the way and will kick in on October 1, 2013. Doctors often rightly complain that the current billing system is needlessly complex, requiring medical offices to employ sometimes two or three people to ensure bills submitted to the government and private insurance companies for reimbursement are accurate.  Well, those doctors ain't seen nothing yet.

The federal update has gone from bad to worse. The new coding system will expand the current 18,000 different codes to a total of 140,000 and takes the current billing code that describes the medical condition of the patient and the treatment offered to include where an injury has occurred (differentiating from the bedroom and the bathroom). 

One can imagine that this will waste a lot of your doctor's time as he will now be required to ask a lot more questions to determine not just what is wrong with you medically but that you dislocated  your toe on a squash court (seriously, the update includes a code for squash court: Y92311).  And your doctor will need to take a lot more notes in your medical records to ensure your insurer knows exactly what happened. But the new coding system goes even further. There are, the WSJ reports, different codes for run-ins with our fine feathered friends. Separate codes, depending on the kind of bird your accident involves, include ducks, macaws, geese, parrots, turkeys and chickens. 

None of these additions are likely to improve the quality of healthcare, but it wlll open the door for government and your insurance company to keep better tabs on you.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC.


Bookmark and Share

 
AHEC on Facebook AHEC on Twitter AHEC on Twitter

Recent Posts


Tags


Archive