Prescription for Disaster

Religious Liberty under assault due to ObamaCare

Friday, January 20, 2012
Grace-Marie Turner, blogging at NRO, has a great blog post about yet another example of the unconstitutionality of ObamaCare.

Turner points out that the Administration decided today to wait until after the elections to begin requiring faith-based health organizations to give out contraceptions. For many organizations, this is a violation of a core belief.

Turner writes:
The Obamacare regulation gives faith-based institutions, like Catholic universities and hospitals, the choice of violating the fundamental tenets of their faith by covering the federally mandated coverage in their employee health plans, or of dropping health insurance for their employees — in which case they would be fined for violating the employer mandate.



Bookmark and Share

California Employers Eliminate Employee Insurance in Response to ObamaCare

Friday, January 20, 2012
The House Ways and Means (WAM) Committee has posted the results of a recent survey of California employers on the subject of healthcare. What the survey concludes is very bad news for employees. WAM's website categorizes the results as follows: "Findings in the newly released 2011 California Employer Health Benefits Survey reveal that the proportion of California employers offering coverage to their employees declined from 73 percent to 63 percent since the Democrats’ health care overhaul was signed into law."

That is bad news, very bad news for California's employees.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC



Bookmark and Share

Economists Agree: ObamaCare Bad for Your Health (care system)

Thursday, January 19, 2012

The American Action Network has linked to a brief which details the economists view of ObamaCare, specifically the individual mandate. The economists support severing the mandate from ObamaCare. AAN writes:

Amici Curiae are 103 economists who have studied, researched, and participated in the national policy discussion relating to the healthcare markets. Amici include Nobel laureates, former senior government officials, and faculty from research universities around the country. Amici support the need for reform but believe that the Affordable Care Act (“ACA” or the “Act”) will likely exacerbate, rather than constrain, the inflation in healthcare costs that poses a serious long-term challenge to the U.S. economy.

You can read the brief on AAN's website, here.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC


Bookmark and Share

Idaho Misleads Citizens in Effort to Push ObamaCare Exchange

Monday, January 16, 2012
According to John Goodman's blog post from January 6, 2012, Idaho Governor Butch Otter is claiming Idaho will loose 20% of the federal government's share of Medicaid funding for his state unless the state creates a state insurance exchange (or $300 million.  Goodman and AHEC agree states should NOT create the exchanges.

As to Otter's claims of losing funds, Graham writes: "Look folks, the whole notion is bunk. There is no connection whatsoever between a state's federal matching funds and whether it establishes a Health Benefits Exchange. No state should establish a Health Benefits Exchange - period, full stop."

Otter has since backed of his claims but this begs the question, "Why lie about it?"  


Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC


Bookmark and Share

Repealing ObamaCare (from The Weekly Standard)

Sunday, January 15, 2012

The Weekly Standard has a great article about the likelihood of repealing ObamaCare in the coming years.  According to American Crossroads PAC, the importance of the ObamaCare repeal in the 2012 election will determine the chances of repeal in the future.

From the article:

More than anything else, what will determine success or failure in making that case and building that momentum is the degree to which the Republican presidential nominee chooses to make repeal a cornerstone of his campaign.  Mitt Romney lists repealing Obamacare as one of the 59 points in his economic plan, but he doesn’t list it among the plan’s top-5 legislative priorities. Moreover, rather than saying he has learned from his mistakes, that he now knows we need an approach that focuses on lowering health costs (and preserving liberty), and that he believes what happens in liberal Massachusetts should stay firmly in Massachusetts, he has defended his health-care law in ways thatcould often double as defenses of Obamacare.  



Bookmark and Share

Sen. Hatch Makes Several Good Points About the Real Costs of ObamaCare

Friday, January 13, 2012

Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) made several good points about the real cost of ObamaCare, including:

  • $2,100 increase in premiums for families buying insurance on their own due to ObamaCare. (Letter from the Congressional Budget Office to Senator Evan Bayh regarding health care premiums, November 30, 2009)
  • 65 percent of small businesses say it does nothing to slow down the cost of health insurance – the primary cost driver facing our nation’s job creators despite President Obama’s pledge to reduce premiums for American families by $2,500. (National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) Foundation Study, July 2011)
  • 77 percent of small businesses say it will increase taxes which in turn will directly affect their ability to create jobs. (National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) Foundation Study, July 2011)
  • Insurance premiums have increased by almost 200 percent from 3 percent in 2010 to 9 percent in 2011 for families since the passage of the partisan health law. (Annual employer health benefits survey conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research & Educational Trust, September 27, 2011)
  • 9.4 percent increase in private health insurance premiums in 2014 (4.4 percentage points higher than without the health law). (“National Health Spending Projections Through 2020: Economic Recovery And Reform Drive Faster Spending Growth,” Health Affairs, July 28, 2011)
  • The cost of health care will continue to rise from 8 percent in 2011 to 8.5 percent in 2012. (Pricewaterhouse Coopers Health Research Institute Study, Medical Cost Trends for 2012)
  • $311 billion projected increase in health costs due to ObamaCare. (Report from Richard S. Foster, Chief Actuary at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, April 22, 2010)
  • The President's own Chief Actuary stated that savings from the health law’s programs, estimated by the Administration to be $50 billion over 10 years, are 'unlikely.' (Letter from Richard S. Foster, Chief Actuary at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, September 2, 2011)
  • $118 billion in new costs imposed on states for ObamaCare's Medicaid expansions—budgetary costs that will crowd out other state programs like education or law enforcement. (Joint Report by the Senate Finance Committee and House Energy and Commerce Committee, Medicaid Expansion in the New Health Law: Costs To The States, March 1, 2011)

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC


Bookmark and Share

Former Obama Advisor Concedes Mandate a Mistake

Thursday, January 12, 2012
A former advisor to both HIllary Clinton and Barack Obama, Princeton Professor Paul Starr, has written a new article in which he argues that ObamaCare's individual mandate was a mistake.  The title of Starr's article says it all: "The Health Care Mandate Really Was a Mistake,"  He writes in his article that: 

  • "Congress and the president made three miscalculations in one—a miscalculation about the courts, another about the politics, and a third about the policy itself."
  • "That the mandate was a political as well as a legal miscalculation should also now be clear. When Congress passed the Affordable Care Act, many observers expected that controversy would die down, and the law would soon be as widely accepted as Medicare is. That hasn’t happened."
  • "The mandate is one reason why the law’s opponents have been able to sustain their cause. No other provision could have provided as effective a basis for both the legal challenges to the law and the political campaigns against it; voters in 14 states have passed amendments to their state constitutions prohibiting an individual mandate."
  • "Democrats managed to get themselves the worst possible result: a law that enflames the opposition on the basis of overreaching federal power but may not work in practice because there is no real power behind it," he writes.
  • "Whether or not the Court strikes it down, the individual mandate has been one of the most serious political and policy mistakes of recent decades."
You can read Starr's full article here.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC


Bookmark and Share

Weakness in Government's Case in ObamaCare

Wednesday, January 11, 2012
The Hill is reporting that lawyers see weaknesses in the government's case defending ObamaCare and its individual mandate. Read the full article here.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter
 @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC

Bookmark and Share

How the IRS "Tax Gap" and ObamaCare are Connected

Tuesday, January 10, 2012
On Friday, January 6, the Internal Revenue Service issued a press release claiming what the "tax gap" (or federal taxes which are not paid on time) was for tax year 2006. The IRS estimates that $385 billion was not collected in 2006 ($376 billion was from "underreporting"). Before anyone in Congress thinks that they can or would be able to close the tax gap, they should be reminded the tried and they failed as part of ObamaCare.

What?  Yes. That is where the failed 1099 revenue provision of ObamaCare came from (it was supposed to close the tax gap and raise $17.1 billion to "pay for" ObamaCare). Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND) regularly talks about closing the tax gap as if it is as easy as buying a coke from a vending machine. The problem is that collecting even a fraction of the tax gap imposes a huge compliance burden every business and many individual taxpayers. That is why Congress sought to repeal ObamaCare's 1099 provision before it even went into effect.  So as you read articles about the tax gap and people "not paying their fare share" just remember that closing the tax gap is not as easy as the politicians say it is (they should know better, they tried, they failed to close it in 2010).

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC.

Bookmark and Share

Thirty-Six Senate Republicans File Amicus Brief on ObamaCare

Monday, January 09, 2012
Thirty-Six Senate Republicans filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in favor of the states' lawsuit against ObamaCare.  The brief argues that: 

“This Court must defer to this clear expression of Congress’ intent regarding the role of the individual mandate… To maintain the Constitution’s balance, this Court cannot ignore Congress’ determination as to what is essential to the PPACA’s scheme and leave in place a statute Congress would not—and did not—enact.”

“If Congress intended for the PPACA to survive without the individual mandate, it could have protected its major legislative reform simply by including a clause which would have guided this Court and resulted in a strong presumption of severability – a clause which was already before it in a prior version of the PPACA. Congress did not do so.

“Under these circumstances, this Court cannot leave a patchwork alternative to the PPACA in place without the heart of the legislation. Rather, such a determination must be left to the elected representatives of the people.”

The brief was signed by: Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO), Sen. John Boozman (R-AR), Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), Sen. Daniel Coats (R-IN), Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS), Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID), Sen. Michael Enzi (R-WY), Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Sen. Dean Heller (R-NV), Sen. John Hoeven (R-ND), Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA), Sen. Mike Johanns (R-NE), Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), Sen. Richard Lugar (R-IN), Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Sen. James Risch (R-ID), Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS), Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), Sen. John Thune (R-SD), Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA).

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC.

Bookmark and Share

 
AHEC on Facebook AHEC on Twitter AHEC on Twitter

Recent Posts


Tags


Archive